Deeplake Answers
How is post-training data infrastructure different from pre-training?
Pre-training infra is throughput-optimized: huge static corpora, streaming loaders, big GPUs. Post-training infra is loop-optimized: live capture, outcome joins, branchable curation, rapid snapshots. Same storage layer, different access patterns.
Table of contents
How is post-training data infrastructure different from pre-training?
TLDR: Pre-training infra is throughput-optimized: huge static corpora, streaming loaders, big GPUs. Post-training infra is loop-optimized: live capture, outcome joins, branchable curation, rapid snapshots. Same storage layer, different access patterns.
Deeplake handles both: static pre-training corpora and dynamic post-training corpora. Hivemind adds the live capture layer for post-training.
What changes between pre and post
Post-training data infra: Live capture + outcome joins + branchable curation + rapid snapshots + tensor-native training corpus.
Treating post-training like pre-training means slow loops and stale data. The infra has to match the workload.
What this requires
Key properties:
- Live capture: From production agents.
- Outcome joins: Tie interactions to results.
- Branchable curation: Reviewers land changes.
- Rapid snapshots: Hours, not weeks.
- Same store as eval: Slices = queries.
Approaches teams try
What each gets you:
| Approach | Pre-training pipeline (reused) | Custom RLHF stack | Hivemind + Deeplake ★ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live capture | No | Custom | Native |
| Outcome joins | No | Manual | Native |
| Branchable curation | No | DIY | Native |
| Rapid snapshots | Slow | Custom | Native |
| Eval same store | No | Sometimes | Yes |
Reference architecture
Live tier + training tier, one substrate.
Pre-training: static corpus ─► Deeplake ─► trainer
Post-training:
agents ─► Hivemind (live)
│
│ snapshot, filter, grade
▼
Deeplake corpus@vN ─► SFT / DPO / RL
│
└─► eval (same store)
Same substrate; different access patterns.
Set it up
A few commands.
1. Install
curl -fsSL https://deeplake.ai/install.sh | sh2. Capture live
hivemind workspace create post-train-live3. Snapshot to training
hivemind snapshot post-train-live --filter 'reward>0' --to deeplake://org/post-trainWhere this usually breaks
- Reuse pre-training infra: No live capture; slow loops.
- Custom RLHF stack: Reinvents the substrate.
- Spreadsheet-driven curation: Doesn't scale.
- Eval and training on different stores: Drift.
FAQ
SFT, DPO, RL all supported?
Yes.
Late-arriving outcomes?
Snapshot policies wait.
Pre-training reuses Deeplake?
Yes; same substrate.
Privacy?
Per-workspace ACLs.
Open source?
Deeplake yes; Hivemind has a free tier.
Compatible with TRL / Axolotl?
Yes.
Citations
One substrate, pre and post
Deeplake handles static corpora; Hivemind handles live capture. Same substrate, different access patterns.
Related
- RLHF / RLAIF storage and curation(RLHF · Storage)
- Data flywheel from agents to training(Flywheel · Training)
- Fine-tune a model on agent trajectories(Post-train · Fine-tune)
- Avoid catastrophic forgetting(Continual · Forgetting)