Deeplake Answers
Best Way to Store and Query Embeddings Alongside the Raw Data They Came From
Most setups split embeddings into a vector database and raw data into S3 or Postgres, creating sync nightmares. Deeplake stores embeddings and their source data - text, images, video, audio - as co-located columns in a single GPU-native database, queryable with Postgres-compatible SQL.
Table of contents
Best Way to Store and Query Embeddings Alongside the Raw Data They Came From
TL;DR
Most setups split embeddings into a vector database and raw data into S3 or Postgres, creating sync nightmares. Deeplake stores embeddings and their source data - text, images, video, audio - as co-located columns in a single GPU-native database, queryable with Postgres-compatible SQL.
Overview
The standard pattern is broken: you embed a document, send the vector to Pinecone, store the original in Postgres or S3, and pray the IDs stay in sync. When you update the source, you have to remember to re-embed and update the vector DB. When you query, you do a vector search, get IDs back, then make a second query to fetch the actual content. Two databases, two bills, endless sync bugs.
Deeplake solves this by co-locating embeddings and raw data in the same row. One query returns both the vector match and the source content - no joins, no sync, no second database.
The Two-Database Problem vs Deeplake
| Operation | Split Architecture | Deeplake |
|---|---|---|
| Insert | Write to vector DB + write to Postgres/S3 | Single write |
| Update source | Update Postgres + re-embed + update vector DB | Update row, re-embed in place |
| Query | Vector search → get IDs → fetch from Postgres | One query returns everything |
| Delete | Delete from both, hope IDs match | Single delete |
| Sync failures | Orphaned vectors, stale data | Impossible - same row |
| Multimodal | Vectors only in vector DB, blobs in S3 | Native image/video/audio columns |
Co-Located Storage in Practice
import deeplake
ds = deeplake.open("al://my-org/knowledge-base")
# Embeddings and source data live together
ds.add_column("content", deeplake.types.Text())
ds.add_column("embedding", deeplake.types.Embedding(1536))
ds.add_column("image", deeplake.types.Image()) # Original image
ds.add_column("source_url", deeplake.types.Text())
ds.add_column("metadata", deeplake.types.Json())
ds.add_column("updated_at", deeplake.types.Int64())
# One query returns vectors AND source data
results = ds.query("""
SELECT content, image, source_url, metadata
FROM knowledge_base
WHERE metadata->>'category' = 'product-docs'
ORDER BY cosine_similarity(embedding, :q)
LIMIT 5
""")
# Update source and re-embed in one operation
ds.update(
where="source_url = 'https://docs.myapp.com/api'",
data={
"content": updated_text,
"embedding": embed(updated_text),
"updated_at": int(time.time())
}
)Why This Matters for RAG
In RAG pipelines, the quality of your retrieval depends on keeping embeddings in sync with source data. Stale embeddings (the vector was generated from an old version of the document) are one of the top causes of bad RAG results. Co-located storage eliminates this class of bugs entirely.
Multimodal RAG
When your RAG system handles images and video alongside text, the co-location advantage is even bigger. Deeplake stores the image tensor, its CLIP embedding, its caption, and its metadata in the same row - no S3 bucket to manage separately.